Quantitative Literature Review (First Full Draft – 80 points, Final Draft – 160 points). Students will be
required to type 2000-5000 words interpreting, evaluating, and synthesizing the results from at least five (I suggest no more than eight) peer-reviewed articles or books from academic presses that include bivariate or multivariate statistical analyses to see what others have discovered that may be relevant to their question. You do not have to use the ones from Stage II. The literature review should be typed, double- spaced, with page numbers and use of APSA citations in text. The following steps should be part of your QLR:
- Create a cover page. Come up with a title other than “literature review” or the like (you may want to save this part for last, since you may not know your thesis yet); add your name and institutional affiliation (presumably, Texas A&M University – Central Texas).
- Begin the literature review by establishing your question and its importance. This should take a paragraph or
- Then provide a thesis about the research on that question. This could take the form of an answer to the question suggested by the research, a claim that the research can be divided into several categories (each with its own approach to the question), or that the research to date has been inadequate (if so, you should provide an idea — or several — for better researching the question near the end of your literature review). This should not take more than a paragraph, and the thesis itself should be a single
- Now establish your thesis through a review of each piece of the literature – its dependent variable, its theoretical approach (answer) to the question, its research design, its statistical methods, and your interpretation of the statistical results (which may well differ from the author’s own interpretations). Conclude your discussion of each piece of literature by examining the weaknesses of the author’s approach and what knowledge we gain from the study (if any).
- Conclude by comparing the literature you’ve just reviewed, taking care to provide the necessary warrants that connect the studies to your thesis. Suggest a path for future researchers to
- Write an abstract describing the thesis and main findings of your review. It should be about 100- 200 words. Either place it at the bottom of your title page, or insert it on its own page between the title page and main text of the paper
- Attach a properly-formatted APSA-style works cited page.