Physiology of Women in Sport Professional Publication Article Grading Rubric

Assignment Score =

(Score calculated as follows: Average Score on Quality Criteria – Deductions for Timeliness, Preparatory Work, Source Quantity, and Word Limit  +/- Additions/Deductions for  Assignment Integrity

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Physiology of Women in Sport Professional Publication Article Grading Rubric
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

 

Criterion: Timeliness of Submission

It is expected that you submit your paper on time.  Late papers will be penalized as outlined in the Guidelines for this paper.

 

Was the paper submitted on time?                                                YES                          NO—if no, how late was the paper? _____________________

 

Criterion:  Preparatory Work

It is expected that you submit an approved topic,reference list and outline for this assignment by the time and date shown on the syllabus.  For each of these preparatory assignments not submitted your final score for this assignment will be reduced by 10-percentage points.

 

Was an approved topic submitted on time?                                 YES                          NO

Was a reference list submitted on time?                                       YES                          NO

Was a meaningful and useful outline submitted on time?         YES                          NO                         

 

Criterion:  Source Quantity

It is expected that you reference up to 20 peer-reviewed sources, no more than 1/3 of which are secondary sources (review articles, professional websites, book chapters). You must have at least 13 primary research articles. If this criterion is not met your final score for this assignment will be reduced by 15-percentage points.

 

Was this criterion met?                                                                     YES                          NO

 

Criterion:  Word Limit

It is expected that your article bea minimum of2500 but no more than 3500 words including in-text references, works cited, tables and graphs.  If this criterion is not met your final score for this assignment will be reduced by 15-percentage points.

 

Was this criterion met?                                                                     YES                          NO

 

 

 

 

 

Criterion:  Assignment Integrity

 

Which of the following best describes the integrity of this assignment? Final Adjustment to Score Earned
Assignment is free of typographical, grammatical and spelling errors, and was reflective of conscientious attention to detail. Add 3-percentage points to the final score for this assignment.

 

Although generally neat and organized, the assignment contained several errors, reflecting inconsistent conscientious attention to detail. No change to the final score for this assignment.
Assignment was disorganized and contained numerous errors and reflected a lack of conscientious attention to detail. Deduct 3-percentage points from the final score for this assignment.

 

 

Criterion: Source Relevance

 

Which of the following best describes the relevance of the sources for this assignment? Final Adjustment to Score Earned
All sources were not only immediately relevant to the topic but also reflected an effective effort to obtain the highest quality, most methodologically sound evidence available. Add 5-percentage points to the final score for this assignment.
All sources were immediately relevant to the topic but, in some cases, failed to reflect an effort to obtain the highest quality, most methodologically sound evidence available. No change to the final score for this assignment.
Many sources were not immediately relevant to the topic and may also have lacked in quality and sound methodology. Deduct 5-percentage points from the final score for this assignment.

 

Criterion:  Referencing

 

Which of the following best describes the referencing of sources for this assignment? Final Adjustment to Score Earned
All sources were referenced accurately and consistently (both in-text and in the works cited) using the required referencing format. Add 2-percentage points to the final score for this assignment.
Most sources were referenced (both in-text and in the works cited) accurately and consistently using the required referencing format. No change to the final score for this assignment.
Sources were referenced inconsistently or inaccurately (either in-text and in the works cited) and/or the required referencing format was not used. Deduct 2-percentage points from the final score for this assignment.

 

 

 

Criteria:  Assignment Quality

 

Criterion 90% 80% 70% 60% Score
Components

(Title, Byline, Learning Objectives, Introduction, Body and Summary)

Skillfully presented and articulated all of the required components resulting in a quality assignment with strong reader appeal. Effectively presented and articulated all of the required components resulting in a quality assignment. Included all of the required components resulting in a complete assignment. Failed to include all of the required components resulting in an incomplete assignment.  
Organization Effectively organized information from sources to present a logical and systematic report that moved fluently between themes. Organized information from sources to present a logical and systematic report. Superficially organized information from sources to present a report lacking in uniform logic. Failed to adequately organize information from sources resulting in a fragmented report lacking in logic.  
Audience Skillfully conveyed information consistently appropriate to the intellectual and professional capabilities and interests of the target audience. Conveyed information generally appropriate to the intellectual and professional capabilities and interests of the target audience. Conveyed information that was not consistently appropriate to the intellectual and professional capabilities or interests of the target audience. Failed to convey information appropriate to the intellectual and professional capabilities of the target audience.  
Analysis and Evaluation Offered an accurate, thoughtful and in-depth evaluation and analysis indicative of an ability to theoretically interpret and apply the research. Offered an evaluation and analysis of the presented research though that evaluation may have lacked accuracy and/or depth. Offered only minimal evaluation and analysis of the presented research. Offered no evaluation or analysis of the presented research.  
Theoretical Depth Skillfully referenced and utilized all acquired information to present a report centered around a thesis that effectively and objectively integrated the whole of that evidence. Referenced and utilized all acquired information to present a report centered around a thesis that objectively integrated the whole of that evidence. Referenced all acquired information in text, but failed to center the report around a thesis that integrated the whole of that evidence. Failed to reference or utilize all of the acquired information resulting in an incomplete report.  
Writing and Communication Efficiently and eloquently articulated information to present a robust and coherent report that flowed smoothly and was indicative of an ability to employ nuanced and effective writing skills. Efficiently articulated information to present a coherent report that was indicative of an ability to employ effective writing skills. Communicated information on a simplistic level to present a report that was generally indicative of an ability to employ basic writing skills. Ineffectively communicated information resulting in a fragmented report indicative of an inability to employ basic writing skills.  
Average Score for Quality Criteria