How does Socrates argue, against Polus, that rhetoric is not an “expertise” at all, but rather a “knack”?

How does Socrates argue, against Polus, that rhetoric is not an “expertise” at all, but rather a “knack”? A knack for doing what? Why doesn’t rhetoric represent genuine “statesmanship,” but instead only “flattery”? Explain Socrates’ argument in as much detail as possible. (Pp. 28-33)

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
How does Socrates argue, against Polus, that rhetoric is not an “expertise” at all, but rather a “knack”?
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *