Financial Transactions

10

· Gains the attention of the viewer, States Thesis, establishes credibility, Previews main points

· 9.0 to >8.0 pts Good

· Meets any three of four criteria

· 8.0 to >7.0 pts Needs Improvement

· Meets any two of four criteria

· 7.0 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Requirements

· Meets only one of the four criteria Meets none of the criteria

20

· Creative and comprehensive organizational pattern. Consistently maintained and enhanced cohesiveness of speech. Multiple occurrences of internal and comprehensive transitions.

· 18.0 to >16.0 pts Good

· Good use of organizational patterns. Usually maintained and contributed to cohesiveness of speech. A couple of occurrences of awkward internal and comprehensive transitions.

· 16.0 to >14.0 pts Needs Improvement

· Attempted to use an organizational pattern. You tried to maintain and add to the cohesiveness of speech. Some occurrences of internal and comprehensive transitions.

· 14.0 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Requirements

· Speech lacked organization and cohesiveness overall. Did not use any internal transitions or basic signposts, “next, second” transitional words. Incoherence; poor organization and transition.

40%

40

· Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources. When visual aids are used, they are easy to interpret.

· 36.0 to >32.0 pts Good

· Some significant but not major errors or omissions in the demonstration of knowledge. Though visual aids are used, some are difficult to interpret.

· 32.0 to >28.0 pts Needs Improvement

· Major errors or omissions in the demonstration of knowledge. Though visual aids are used, most are difficult to interpret.

· 28.0 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Requirements

· Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials. No knowledge of the material

20%

20

· Exhibited confidence. Expressed vocal variety. Engaging gestures, facial expressions, and appearance greatly enhanced the message. Minimal nervous mannerisms. Eye contact with the audience or the camera virtually all the time (except for glances at notes).

· 18.0 to >16.0 pts Good

· Confidence is usually apparent. Usually displayed vocal variety. Good use of gestures, facial expressions, and appearance was appropriate. Some nervous mannerisms. Eye contact with the audience or the camera most of the time.

· 16.0 to >14.0 pts Needs Improvement

· Appears somewhat confident. Natural vocal variety but lacked expressive emphasis; Adequate gestures and facial expressions; appearance was satisfactory. Several nervous mannerisms. Eye contact with the audience or the camera less than 50% of the time.

· 14.0 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Requirements

· Lacked confidence. Ineffective vocal delivery. Futile gestures and facial expressions; inappropriate or distracting appearance. Continual nervous mannerisms, vocal fillers, and distracting movement. Little or no eye contact with the audience or the camera. Ineffective delivery.

10

· Cues viewer that the end of the speech is at hand. Brings closure. Restates the main points of the presentation. Memorable.

· 9.0 to >8.0 pts Good

· Attempts to cue viewer and brings closure, but not effectively.

· 8.0 to >7.0 pts Needs Improvement

· Attempts to bring closure, but does not restate or leave an impression.

· 7.0 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Requirements

· It does not bring closure; the audience is left hanging. It does not bring closure; the viewer is left hanging.

Plagiarism: 0%